Dismissed

M/S.Terra Agro Technology v. the Tn Electricity Regulatory

Madras HC11 Mar 2021CMA/3459/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by M/s. Jain Irrigation System Ltd. challenging TNERC letters as not maintainable, holding they were filed under a repealed Act and requiring the appellant to approach the competent authority instead.

What did the court decide?

The appeals stand dismissed as not-maintainable. The appellant is at liberty to approach the competent authority.

M/S.Terra Agro Technology Vs the Tn Electricity Regulatory — Madras HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 11.03.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

C.M.A.Nos.3459 to 3461 of 2006 C.M.P.Nos.2 & 2 of 2006

¶6

M/s.Jain Irrigation System Ltd., rep.by its Senior Vice President M/s.Shanthi Kumar Kataria, No.90, Ellayamuthur Udumalpet Taluk, Coimbatore District-642 152. .. Appellant in all appeals Cause title amended vide the order of this Court dated 26.09.2007 made in M.P.Nos.1, 1 & 1 of 2007 in C.M.A.Nos.3459 to 3461 of 2006. vs. 1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep.by its Chairman, No.17, Third Main Road, Seethammal Colony, Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018. 2. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep.by its Chairman, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3. The Superintendent Engineer, Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle, Udumalpet Taluk, Coimbatore District. 4. The Executive Engineer, O & M Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle, Udumalpet-642 146, Udumalpet Taluk, Coimbatore District. .. Respondents in all appeals.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

PRAYER IN C.M.A.No.3459 OF 2006 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 27 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998, against the Letter No.TNERC/DT/TC/F.TR/C.40/D160/2005 dated 21.02.2005 passed by the first respondent.

¶9

PRAYER IN C.M.A.No.3460 OF 2006 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 27 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998, against the Letter No.TNERC/DT/TC/F.TR/C.401/D354/2005 dated 26.04.2005 passed by the first respondent.

¶10

PRAYER IN C.M.A.No.3461 OF 2006 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 27 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998, against the Letter No.TNERC/DT/TC/F.TR/ C.168/D621/2005 dated 15.07.2005 passed by the first respondent.

¶11

In all appeals For Appellant : Mr.P.T.Ramadevi For Respondents :Mr.V.Viswanathan for RR2 to 4

¶12

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶13

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed questioning the letters dated 21.02.2005, 26.04.2005 and 15.07.2005 issued by the first respondent.

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reiterated that as per the determination of Tariff for Generation and Distribution issued by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission dated 20.06.2013, this tariff is applicable irrespective of owner ship of land if the usage of electricity is for agriculture and its allied activities.

¶15

However, when the question of maintainability is raised, all those merits cannot be adjudicated by this Court in the present appeals. Section 185 of the Electricity Act provides repeal and saving. Accordingly, the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 are hereby repealed. The letter issued by the first respondent alone is under challenge in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeals.

¶16

4. The appeals on hand are filed under Section 27 of the Erstwhile Act. Therefore, the appeals are not entertainable. However, the appellant is at liberty to approach the competent authority/forum for the purpose of redressing their grievances. In the event of filing any petition or appeal, the pendency of the appeal before this Court is also to be taken into

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

consideration for the purpose of condoning the delay if any. With these observations, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.3459 to 3461 of 2006 stand dismissed as not-maintainable. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar

¶20

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
SSB
To
1. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission,
No.17, Third Main Road,
Seethammal Colony,
Alwarpet,
Chennai-600 018.
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
No.800, Anna Salai,
Chennai-600 002.
3. The Superintendent Engineer,
Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle,
Udumalpet Taluk,
Coimbatore District.
4. The Executive Engineer, O & M
Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle,
Udumalpet-642 146,
Udumalpet Taluk,
Coimbatore District.
+1 cc to Mr.V.Viswanathan, Advocate SR.No.15738
C .M.A.Nos.3459 to 3461 of 2006
C.M.P.Nos.2 & 2 of 2006
GA (CO)
TE (17/04/2021)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Terra Agro Technology v. the Tn Electricity Regulatory

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Terra Agro Technology v. the Tn Electricity Regulatory

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Subash Chandran Vs S.Tamilselvi

Ilayappan, Vs Shanmughavadivu

Periya Nayaki@Jeevitha Vs Ganesan

G.Rasu Vs Union of India

P.K.Prakash Vs R.Dayalan

S.Angappan @ Samiyappan Vs K.P.Shanmugam