3. The questions of law are relateable to the facts and circumstances. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that no substantial question of law has been raised. However, on perusal of the award, it reveals that the application under the Workmen Compensation Act was filed with false set of facts and suppressing some material facts. It is sufficient to consider the fact that the United India Insurance Company in clear terms established that the claim petition filed under the Workmen Compensation Act is false one and certain vital facts are suppressed. M.C.O.P.No.13 of 1998 was filed under the Motor Vehicles Act claiming damages. In the said M.C.O.P.No.13 of 1998, the petitioner stated that KL 11 7899 Vehicle belongs to the deceased/Rajukumar and he was stated as the owner of the vehicle. In view of the fact that the said application was not pressed, M.C.O.P.No.13 of 1998 was dismissed on 24.12.1999. In fact, the petitioner has claimed own damages for the loss. In the said petition, the husband of the first appellant herein is mentioned as V.Rajukumar, who was stated as a owner of the vehicle. These facts were suppressed while filing an application under the Workmen Compensation Act. These factors were considered by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour and further, the Deputy Commissioner of Labour in award
