Dismissed

Royal Sundaram Alliance v. Sivagami

Madras HC22 Apr 2021CMA/2439/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by an insurance company seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation. The appeal was treated as withdrawn after a memo confirmed that a settlement had been reached and compensation paid at the tribunal.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Royal Sundaram Alliance Vs Sivagami — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 22.04.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

¶5

C.M.A.No.2439 of 2014 and

¶6

M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶7

Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.,
R.N.S. Motors Limited, Yaswntpur,
Bangalore, Karnataka State. .. Appellant
Vs.
1. Sivagami
2. N.Nagaraj
3. Sudha
4. Sumathi
5. Archana .. Respondents
(Fifth respondent remained exparte)
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173
of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree
dated 28.11.2013 made in M.C.O.P.No.91 of 2009 on the file of
the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Judge, Mettur.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy
J U D G M E N T

¶8

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed for enhancement of compensation granted by the award dated 28.11.2013 made in M.C.O.P.No.91 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Judge, Mettur.

¶9

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal, since the dispute between the parties is settled before the trial Court and he has mailed a memo to that effect.

¶10

The memo mailed by the learned counsel for the appellant reads as follows:-

¶11

“MEMO FILED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT: It is submitted that the above case was posted for final hearing on 19.04.2021. It is submitted that the above appeal filed against the judgment

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

and decree passed in MCOP 91 of 2009, MACT, Mettur was compromised mutually between the parties, accordingly, the agreed compensation amount was paid and thereby, the case got settled before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Mettur.

¶14

Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit me to withdraw the appeal as dismissed as withdrawn.”

¶15

Recording the said memo, dated 20.04.2021 this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶16

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
mra
To
1.The Sub Judge,
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
Mettur.
2.The Section Officer,
V.R.Section,
High Court, Madras.
C.M.A.No.2439 of 2014
AD(CO)
SP(29/06/2021)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Royal Sundaram Alliance v. Sivagami

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Royal Sundaram Alliance v. Sivagami

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugesan Vs K.Selvaraj

Thankammal Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M. Sethu Vs Pandian

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs M.Praveen Kumar

Manikandan Vs D. Banugopan

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Dharmapuri Vs Duraisamy