Dismissed

Manonmani v. the Managing Director

Madras HC30 Apr 2021CMA/2093/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award was filed claiming enhancement of compensation for a fatal accident. However, counsel for the appellants withdrew the challenge, accepting the Tribunal's award as just and fair. The Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the awarded compensation of Rs.15,95,000 along with interest and costs, and directed the Respondent to deposit the amoun

What did the court decide?

Compensation of Rs.15,95,000 along with interest and costs awarded by the Tribunal is confirmed; Respondent directed to make the deposit.

Manonmani Vs the Managing Director — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.04.2021

¶2

C O R A M

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY C.M.A.No.2093 of 2018

¶4

1.Manonmani

¶5

2.Priya 3.Revathi 4.Minor Sasikala 5.Minor Madheswaran 6.Bakkiyam @ Sivabakkiyam (Minor Petitioner Nos.4 & 5 are represented their next Friend Guardian Mother Manonmani)

¶6

...Appellants/petitioners

¶7

¶8

The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited, No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore.

¶9

... Respondent/Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award dated 12.03.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.698 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Sankari.

¶11

For Appellants : Mr.T.S.Arthanareeswaran

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatachalam

¶13

JUDGMENT

¶14

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.698 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Sankari.

¶15

2.The appellants are the claimants in M.C.O.P.No.698 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Sankari. They filed the above said claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Subramanian in the accident that took place on 23.08.2011.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

3.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by driver of the respondent and directed the respondent-Transport Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.15,95,000/- as compensation to the appellants.

¶18

4.Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal, the appellants have come out with the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

¶19

5.Though, the appellants have preferred the present appeal challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, when the matter is taken up hearing today i.e on 30.04.2021, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and fair and the same may be confirmed.

¶20

6.The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent-Transport Corporation has not preferred any appeal against the award passed by the Tribunal.

¶21

7.In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the respondent, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and a sum of Rs.15,95,000/awarded by the Tribunal as compensation to the appellantsclaimants, along with interest and costs is confirmed.

¶22

8.The respondent-Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the award amount along with interest and costs, less the amount if any already deposited, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.698 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Sankari. On such deposit, the appellants 1 to 3 & 6 are permitted to withdraw their respective share of the award amount as per the ratio of apportionment fixed by the Tribunal along with proportionate interest and costs after adjusting the amount, if any already withdrawn, by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal.

¶23

9.The Tribunal is directed to transfer the respective share of award amount to the appellants by way of RTGS, within a period of three weeks from the deposit or from the date of receipt of the Bank details obtained for the claimant or application made by the appellant for withdrawal, whichever is later. The Tribunal is also directed to deposit the share of the minor appellants 4 & 5 in any one of the Nationalized Banks, till the minor appellants 4 & 5 attain majority. On such deposit, the

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

1^st appellant, being the Mother of the minor appellants 4 & 5 is permitted to withdraw the accrued interest once in three months for the welfare of the minor appellants 4 & 5. No costs.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

rst

¶31

To:

¶32

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, The Subordinate Judge, Sankari.

¶33

2.The Section officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶34

+1cc to Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, Advocate SR.No.26913

¶35

C.M.A.No.2093 of 2018

¶36

AD(CO) CB(09/12/2021)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Manonmani v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manonmani v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Manager Vs Latha

Anthonisamy Vs the Managing Director

M. Shanmugam Vs Gunasekaran

M/s a.S.Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dinesh Jain

R.Suresh Vs The Superintending Engineer

M/s.Sonal Irons Industry Vs The Chairman