Partly allowed

M.Ramesh v. Oriental Structural Engineer

Madras HC19 Jan 2021CMA/2041/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Court allotted 30% contributory negligence to the appellant and 70% to the respondent contractor/driver. The appeal was partly allowed, directing the insurer to deposit the claim amount adjusted for negligence with interest.

What did the court decide?

Deposited sum of Rs.4,10,580/- with 7.5% interest from claim date to deposit date, less any amounts already deposited or withdrawn.

M.Ramesh Vs Oriental Structural Engineer — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

TUESDAY THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

C.M.A.No.2041 of 2013

¶6

M.Ramesh

¶7

... Appellant/Petitioner Vs.

¶8

1.Oriental Structural Engineering Pvt.Ltd., Ulundurpet Taluk.

¶9

2.The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai-1. ... Respondents/ Respondents

¶10

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.08.2012 and made in M.C.O.P.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Court) Vridhachalam.

¶11

Decree:This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal coming on for hearing on Monday, the Fourteenth day of December 2020 and upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal,the order of the Lower court and the material records thereupon and upon hearing the arguments of MR.S.Udaya Kumar,Advocate for the Appellant and of Mr.K.Vinod,Advocate for the 2^nd Respondent and regarding the 1^st Respondent not ready in notice and this matter having stood over for consideration till this day this Court while fixing 30 % contributory negligence on the part of the Appellant and remaining 70 % negligence on the part of the contractor and the driver of the insured tractor and this court allowing this appeal in part doth order and decree as follows:

¶12

i)that the 2^nd Respondent/Insurance Company be and hereby is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.4,10,580/-(Rs.Four Lakhs Ten Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty only) together with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit,less any amount already deposited, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.

¶13

ii)that on such deposit being made, the appellant/ Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the same, less any amount already withdrawn, by filing suitable applications before the Tribunal.

¶14

iii)that there be no costs in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Deputy Registrar(Lok Adalat)

¶17

//True Copy//

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

The Principal Sub Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Vridhachalam.

¶21

Copy to: The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court,Madras.

¶22

+1cc to Mrs.Elveera Ravindran, Advocate SR.No. 2058

¶23

Dated:19.01.2021

¶24

DECREE C.M.A.No.2041 of 2013

¶25

Allowing the appeal in part preferred against the Judgment and decree dated 21.08.2012 and made in M.C.O.P.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Court) Vridhachalam etc as stated within.

¶26

VG I(CO) A.SK(21.09.2021)

M.Ramesh v. Oriental Structural Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ramesh v. Oriental Structural Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rvj. Devadoss, Vs the Secretary to the

Tvl. Thirumalai Chemicals Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

The Chennai City Auto Vs The Secretary (Home)

P.Saravanan Vs Oriental Structural Engineer

Andal Vs Oriental Structural Engineer

Tvl.Mayajal Entertainment Vs Deputy Commissioners &