Thangammal v. Malathi
Case brief
What is this about?
First Appeal against a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell property. Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the Trial Court's finding that the agreement is genuine and the subsequent sale was not bona fide.
What did the court decide?
The judgment and decree of the Trial Court allowing specific performance are confirmed; appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on : 30.03.2021 Pronounced on : 08.04.2021
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
& C.M.P.No.14476 of 2020
- Thangammal,
- Suresh,
- Pradeesh,
- Kumaran,
... Appellants/D.1,3,4 & 5
/versus/
- Malathi, ...1st Respondent/Plaintiff
- Latha, ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the sale agreement is enforceable or a forged document executed as security for a loan?
Whether the subsequent sale of the property is a bona fide transaction for valuable consideration?
Whether the plaintiff established readiness and willingness to perform the contract within the limitation period?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Thangammal
- appellant
Suresh
- appellant
Pradeesh
- appellant
Kumaran
- respondent
Malathi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court