This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
A.S. No.67 of 2017
Zakira Begum ...Appellant/Defendant
vs
Syed Zahiruddeen
...Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Order XLI Rule 1 read with Section 96 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 20.06.2016 made in O.S. No.34 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional Family Court at Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.K.T.Mohideen Abdul Khader
For Respondent : Mr.Md.Ashfaq Rafi
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of this Court was delivered by T.RAJA, J.]
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondent fairly submitted that the respondent died in the year 2018 and therefore, the appeal may be closed.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, this appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
The III Additional Family Court at Chennai.
Copy To
The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.
A.S. No.67 of 2017
KSM(CO) RGA(07/12/2021)
Zakira Begum
Syed Zahiruddeen
T. RAJA
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
