V.Kala v. Thamizharasan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the first appeal seeking to set aside a counter claim and judgment from the Pondicherry District Court, confirming the lower court's decree.
What did the court decide?
The judgment and decree dated 25.09.2018 in OS.No.106 of 2014 confirmed and the Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
AS.NOS.338 OF 2019
V.Kala
...Appellant / Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Thamizharasan
2.Sundaram @ Shanmugam
3.R.E.Varadharajan ...Respondents / Defendants
Prayer : Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of CPC r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC to allow the above first appeal by setting aside the counter claim in against the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2018 in OS.No.106 of 2014 on the file of III Additional District Judge, Pondicherry.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the Appellant under Section 96 of CPC to set aside the counter claim in the entitled decree should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.Kala
- respondent
Thamizharasan
- respondent
Sundaram @ Shanmugam
- respondent
R.E.Varadharajan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court