Disposed

Akhsheya Enterprises, Reptd by its Partner Mr.L.Sudhakar, v. Kosmo One(Earlier India Land and properties Private Limited)

Madras HC1 Oct 2021Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/71/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an arbitration petition seeking arbitrator appointment after parties reached a compromise. They settled for Rs. 7,25,000 with GST, petitioner agreeing to withdraw the petition and issue a No Due Certificate.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; terms of compromise recorded in decree; No costs awarded.

Akhsheya Enterprises, Reptd by its Partner Mr.L.Sudhakar, Vs… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No. 71 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 01.10.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No.71 of 2021

¶7

Akhsheya Enterprises, Rep. By its Partner Mr.L.Sudhakar, No.74, Balaji Nagar, Ground Floor, Padikuppam Road, Chennai – 40.

.. Petitioner

KOSMO ONE

(Earlier India Land and Properties Private Limited) India Land Tech Park 1^st Floor, Tower C, No.14, 3^rd Main Road, Ambattur, Chennai – 58. ..Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration

¶12

and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying this Court to (a) to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate on the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent arising out of the work order dated 03.08.2013, (b) direct the Respondent to pay cost and (c) grant such further relief

¶13

as this Court may deem fit under the circumstances of the case and

¶14

thus render justice.

¶15

For Petitioner : Ms.J.Amritha Sarayoo for M/s.TVJ Associates

¶16

For Respondent : Mr.M.Vijayan for M/s.King & Patridge

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶18

Page 1 of 4

¶19

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No. 71 of 2021

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This petition has been filed under Sections 11(5) and (6) of

¶22

the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying the following reliefs:-

¶23

“(a) To appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate on the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent arising out of the work order dated 03.08.2013;

¶24

(b) direct the Respondent to pay cost.”

¶25

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is stated

¶26

by the learned counsel on both sides that compromise has been entered into between the parties and a joint memo of compromise, duly signed by the respective parties, has been filed on 30.09.2021

¶27

and the same is extracted hereunder:-

¶28

“JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE

¶29

1. The above OP is one under Sec.11 for appointment of arbitrator.

¶30

2. The parties have entered into an understanding to amicably resolve the outstanding issues between them.

¶31

3.The Respondent has offered a sum of Rs.7,25,000/- (+GST) towards full and final settlement of all issues and dues between the parties as on date.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶33

Page 2 of 4

¶34

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No. 71 of 2021

¶35

4.The Petitioner has accepted the same and is willing to issue a No Due Certificate, indicating that on payment of the above said sum, there will be no claim or dues whatsoever against the Respondent. The Petitioner also agrees to withdraw O.P.No.71 of 2021 as all dues have been settled.

¶36

5. The parties pray that the O.P. may be disposed of recording the above terms.”

¶37

This Petition stands disposed of in terms of joint memo of compromise dated 30.09.2021 and the same shall form part and parcel of the decree. No costs.

¶38

01.10.2021 Index: Yes/No ssm

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶40

Page 3 of 4

¶41

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No. 71 of 2021

¶42

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶43

(ssm)

¶44

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No.71 of 2021
01.10.2021

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶46

Page 4 of 4

Akhsheya Enterprises, Reptd by its Partner Mr.L.Sudhakar, v. Kosmo One(Earlier India Land and properties Private Limited)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhsheya Enterprises, Reptd by its Partner Mr.L.Sudhakar, v. Kosmo One(Earlier India Land and properties Private Limited)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Vinay Heavy Equipments Vs M/S.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd, Represented by Its Authorised Rep Sasi Kannan and Palani

M/S.Vinay Heavy Equipments Vs Shriram City Union Finance

M/s.Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. Vs Capital Control (India) Private Limited

M/S.Dais Foods Pvt. Ltd., Vs Duraimurugan

L.S.Property Developers P.Ltd. Vs Lakshmi Royal Home,Rep. by its Managing Partner P.Suresh

Moorgate Industries D.M.C.C(formerly known as Stemcor Mesa D.M.C.C) Vs K.I.(International) Ltd.