N.R.yamuna v. D.Bhuvaneswari
Case brief
What is this about?
On 10.11.2021, the High Court allowed three applications regarding O.P. 1015 of 2017 and directed the amendment of the petition and reposting of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Applications A.Nos. 9788 to 9790 of 2019 allowed; direction to carry out amendment and repost the matter.
What the court decided
A.Nos.9788 to 9790 of 2019 in O.P.No.1015 of 2017
A.Nos.9788 to 9790 of 2019 in O.P.No.1015 of 2017
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
A.No.9788 of 2019 has been filed by the applicants seeking to condone
the delay of 90 days in setting aside the abatement caused in view of the death
of the first respondent in O.P.No.1015 of 2017.
- A.No.9789 of 2019 has been filed seeking to set aside the
abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent in O.P.No.1015 of 2017.
- A.No.9790 of 2019 has been filed seeking to bring on record the
legal representatives of the deceased first respondent in O.P.No.1015 of 2017.
duly served and their names have also been printed in the cause list. The
proposed respondents to be impleaded have also been duly served.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether applications for condoning delay, setting aside abatement, and impleading legal representatives can be allowed under Rule 12 of the High Court Rules.
Whether the reasons given in the affidavit satisfy the requirement for condoning the delay.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicants (unnamed)
- respondent
Third respondent in O.P.1015 of 2017
Coram
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court