This court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application due to a prior order and closed the matter.
The application was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.4562 of 2018 in O.P.No.474 of 2018
A.No.4562 of 2018 in O.P.No.474 of 2018
R.PONGIAPPAN ,J.
Heard.
2.In view of the order passed by this Court dated 14.10.2020 in
A.No.7197 of 2019, this Court is not having any jurisdiction to entertain this
application. Hence this application is closed.
06.01.2021
mtl
R.Pongiappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
