The court allowed an applicant's petition to take a lost written statement on record. The applicant claimed the document was misplaced in the registry despite prior condonation of delay for filing. The plaintiff offered no objection.
Written statement of the 7th defendant applicant is taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No. 4005 of 2021 and O.A.No.802 of 2016 in C.S.No.586 of 2016
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
Learned counsel for the applicant informs that the written statement of the 7th defendant / applicant has already been taken on record after condonation of delay in filing it vide order dated 24.07.2018 in A.No.4132 of 2018, however, the written statement could not be traced and hence the present application. 2.The plaintiff offers no objection to the same.
3.In essence, the 7th defendant has right, essentially the reconstruction of the earlier written statement which is lost in the Registry.
4.This application is allowed. The written statement of the 7th defendant is taken on record.
08.11.2021 (1/2)
kas/dk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for taking a lost written statement on record due to registry error should be allowed.
7th Defendant / Applicant
Plaintiff
N. SESHASAYEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
