M/s.Daimler Financial Services India Pvt.Ltd, Represented by its authorised signatory Vs Bindu Kumari

A.No.3210 of 2020

P.T.ASHA, J.

The applicant has filed a memo stating that as follows:

"The applicant states that the objection of respondents with respect to the sole arbitrator and for extension of mandate is without any merit but however the applicant without prejudice to its right and without going into the said averments in the counter is agreeable for appointment of a sole arbitrator by the Hon'ble Court." 2. The said memo is taken on record.

¶5

Accordingly, it is ordered as follows: (i) Ms. R. Meenal, Advocate, 11 Second Street, Jegadambal Colony, Royapettah, Chennai14, Email id-

¶6

1/3

¶7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶8

[email protected], Mobile No.9840353442, is

¶9

appointed as the Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties. The Arbitrator shall continue from the stage at which the earlier Arbitrator had concluded proceedings.

¶10

ii) The learned Arbitrator may, after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing them, pass an award as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the order. It is open to the respondents to raise all legal objections as to the validity of contract.

¶11

iii) The learned Arbitrator is at liberty to fix her remuneration and other incidental expenses as per law.

¶12

iv) The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras High Court Arbitration Rules.

¶13

The Original Petition is, accordingly, allowed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

18.03.2021

mrn

2/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶18

P.T.ASHA, J.

¶19

mrn

¶20

A.No.3210 of 2020
18.03.2021

¶21

3/3

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

M/s.Daimler Financial Services India Pvt.Ltd, Represented by its authorised signatory v. Bindu Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Daimler Financial Services India Pvt.Ltd, Represented by its authorised signatory v. Bindu Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Mr.Rajkumar D and another

M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co., Ltd. Vs Mr.Dinesh Ukabhai Makwana and another

M/S.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.,Ltd., Vs M/s.Swathi Transport and another

V.Ganesh Vs M/s Indostar Capital Finance Limited and another

Mr.Ashraf Parappummal, Vs M/s Ford Credit India Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its authorised signatory

M/s Grd trucks Pvt. Ltd, Rep.by its Director Mr.Mayank Agarwal, Vs M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd.