The Single Judge permitted leave to file a suit seeking mandatory and permanent injunction, noting the cause of action arose within the court's jurisdiction despite respondents residing elsewhere, and directed suit numbering.
Leave to file the suit against all respondents was granted and the filing was posted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.3154 of 2021 in
C.S.D.No.76986 of 2021
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
Seeking leave to file suit against the respondents/defendants,
the applicant/plaintiff have come up with this application.
respondents are residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court, but substantial part of cause of action has arose in Chennai i.e., within the jurisdiction of this Court. To avoid multiplicity of proceedings,
leave is necessary to file single suit against all the respondents/defendants.
the applicant and taking note of the averments made in the plaint,
leave is granted. Registry is directed to number the Suit and post the matter on 09.09.2021.
08.09.2021
mrm
2
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
mrm
A. No.3154 of 2021
in
C.S.D.No.76986 of 2021
08.09.2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file a suit should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings when respondents reside outside jurisdiction.
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
