Single judge quashed an order refusing condonation of delay by 119 days in filing a written statement. The respondent raised no objection, and the application was allowed.
The delay of 119 days in filing the written statement was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No. 2982 of 2021 TOS.No.34 of 2019
A.No.2982 of 2021 in TOS.No.34 of 2019
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
Heard Mr.M.Nalla Thambi,
learned counsel appearing for the
applicant and Mr.Balasubramanian,
learned counsel appearing for the
respondent.
2.Mr.Balasubramanian,
learned counsel appearing for the
respondent has no objection for this
application being allowed. Hence, this
application is allowed, the delay of
119 days in filing the written
statement is condoned.
09.09.2021
kkn/nst
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 119 days in filing the written statement should be condoned.
applicant
respondent
R.SUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
