Dismissed

M/S.Kodak (India) Private Ltd. v. M/s. Kapor Imaging Private Ltd. and 2 others

Madras HC16 Aug 2021A/2813/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought leave to amend its address in the cause title of a pending suit. The court held the application unnecessary, directing the applicant to instead file the required form under Order VI Rule 14-A of the CPC for address changes.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed; applicant directed to file form under Order VI Rule 14-A of CPC.

M/S.Kodak (India) Private Ltd. Vs M/s. Kapor… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

A.No.2813 of 2021

¶7

in C.S. No.220 of 2009

¶8

M/s.Kapoor Imaging Private Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.Sunil Kapoor, (*) No.6, III Street, Balaji Nagar, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

¶9

... Plaintiff

¶10

(Amended as per order dated 28.07.2020 (*) in A.No.1546/2020)

¶11

-Versus-

¶12

M/s.Kodak Polychrome Graphics Asia Export Pte. Ltd., rep. by its Director, No.151, Lorong Chuan Ex.05-01, Lobby A New Techpark, Singapore-556 741.

¶13

M/s.Kodak (India) Private Limited, (Formerly known as M/s.Kodak Graphic Communication (India) Private Limited), rep. by its Director, Kalpataru Synergy, Off Western Express Highway, Vakola, Santacruz East, Mumbai-400 050.

¶14

M/s.Kodak (Singapore) Pte. Limited,() No.151, Lorong Chuan, 05-01, New Tech Park, Singapore-556 741** https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ rep. by its Power Agent Mr.Balachandra Bhaskar Nikumb

¶15

... Defendants

¶16

¶17

()3rd defendant impleaded as per order dated 17.12.2009 in A. No.6814 of 2009**

¶18

A.No.2813 of 2021:-

¶19

M/s.Kodak (India) Private Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Formerly known as M/s.Kodak Graphic Communication (India) Private Limited), Off Western Express Highway, Vokola, Santacruz East, Mumbai-400 050. ..Applicant/2^nd Defendant

¶20

-Versus-

¶21

M/s.Kapoor Imaging Private Limited, Rep. by its Manager No.6, III Street, Balaji Nagar, Royapettah, Chennai-600 032. ...1^st Respondent/Plaintiff

¶22

M/s.Kodak Polychrome Graphics Asia Export Pte. Ltd., No.151, Lorong Chuan Ex.05-01, Lobby A New Techpark, Singapore-556 741. ..2^nd Respondent/1^st Defendant

¶23

M/s.Kodak (Singapore) Pte. Limited, No.151, Lorong Chuan, 05-01, New Tech Park, Singapore-556 741. ..3^rd Respondent/3^rd Defendant

¶24

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the Applicant to amended the address of the Applicant in the cause title of C.S.No.220 of 2009 from “Kalpataru Synergy, Off Western Express Highway, Vokola, Santacruz East, Mumbai-400 050” to “Ground floor, Dani Corporate Park, 158 Dani Compound, Vidyanagari Marg, Kalina, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Santacruz (East), Mumbai-400 098” in the short and long cause title and

¶25

¶26

the Statement of Address under Order VI Rule 14A of CPC.

¶27

This Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing, the Court made the following order:

¶28

This application has been filed seeking leave to permit the applicant to amend the address of the applicant in the cause title of the suit viz., C.S.No.220 of 2009.

¶29

2. Order VI Rule 14-A of the Code of Civil Procedure deals with Address for service of notice on the parties to litigation. The same provides that every pleading shall be accompanied with a statement in the prescribed form regarding address of the parties. Sub-Rule 2 of Rule 14-A provides that the address may from time to time, be changed by lodging in Court a form duly filled up and stating the new address of the party and accompanied by a verified petition.

¶30

3. Therefore, this application is wholly un-necessary and the same is dismissed a un-necessary. It is open to the applicant to file a form as required under Sub-Rule 2 of Rule 14-A of Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure.

¶31

Sd./-RSMJ 16.08.2021

¶32

//Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶33

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶34

JJ 19/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Kodak (India) Private Ltd. v. M/s. Kapor Imaging Private Ltd. and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Kodak (India) Private Ltd. v. M/s. Kapor Imaging Private Ltd. and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chennai Sathatha Sri Vaishnava Vs V.S. Sriman Narayan

M.Uttamchand Vs Mrs.Malar Balu

M/S. N.Ranga Rao and Sons Vs Rohit Marketing

Casa Grande Private Limited Vs Shree Mahalaxmi Enterprises

M/s.Lehry Instrumentation and Valves Private Limited Vs Rubinetterie Bresciane Bonomi Spa

M/s Sri Narasus Coffee Company Private Limited Vs M/s Srimathi Mahalakshiammal Educational Trust and 10 others