An interim application seeking appointment of an arbitrator and security was disposed of as the applicant failed to prove arbitration proceedings were invoked. Direction given to approach learned arbitrator under Section 17.
Application closed with liberty to approach learned Arbitrator under Section 17 of the Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1852 of 2021
Appln. No.1852 of 2021
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
This application has been filed seeking direction to the
respondents to furnish security in the form of Bank Guarantee or in any acceptable manner in favour of the applicant for a sum of Rs.84,88,202.26/- as on 28.02.2021 and have the same renewed and
kept in force until the completion of the arbitration proceedings.
Page 1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
A.No.1852 of 2021
22.10.2021
mst
Page 2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
A.No.1852 of 2021
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
mst
Appln. No.1852 of 2021
22.10.2021
Page 3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for appointment of arbitrator pending without invocation proceedings can be perpetually kept.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Sathish Kumar
Respondents
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
