The High Court of Madras allowed an application to receive documents as additional evidence, subject to proof of relevance. This was a peremptory order recording the submission and the cost of hearing.
Application allowed to receive documents as additional evidence subject to proof and relevancy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1451 of 2021 in C.S.No.680 of 2012
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
This application is filed by the
applicant/plaintiff to grant leave to receive
the documents as additional documents
mentioned in the Schedule II & III.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for
the applicant.
3. Considering the submission made by the
learned counsel appearing for the applicant,
this application is allowed and the
documents shall be received subject to proof
and relevancy.
09.04.2021
ssn
Unknown Applicant/Plaintiff
N.SESHASAYEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
