Application filed to implead the Official Liquidator as a third defendant in the suit. Despite non-appearance of the proposed respondent, the court allowed the application and directed amendment of the plaint.
Official Liquidator impleaded as 3rd defendant; plaintiff directed to file amended plaint by 30.04.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No. 1369 of 2018 in C.S.No. 535 of 1999
A.No. 1369 of 2018 in C.S.No. 535 of 1999
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
This application has been filed seeking to implead the Official
liquidator as a party to the suit, since the 1st defendant company has been directed to be wound up and the Bombay High Court has permitted the plaintiff to proceed with the suit by order dated 18.09.2019 made in C.A.No. 808 of 2009.
and file amended copy of the plaint by 30.04.2021.
07.04.2021
kkn
1/2
A.No. 1369 of 2018 in C.S.No. 535 of 1999
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
KKN
A.No. 1369 of 2018
in
C.S.No. 535 of 1999
07.04.2021
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Official Liquidator can be impleaded as a party to the suit
Whether the application to implead the Official Liquidator should be allowed
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Plaintiff
Official Liquidator
1st Defendant Company
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
