Writ petition filed under Article 226 for issuance of Mandamus for acceptance of rent and reopening of a shop. Court recorded petitioner's submission that the matter became infructuous and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD).No.9975 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P(MD).No.9975 of 2019
N.Devaraj
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.04.2019 to accept the rent paid by the petitioner for shop No.8 at New Bus stand, Marthandam, Kulithurai Corporation, Kanyakumari District and grant permission to reopen the shop as per the norms of lease agreement within a time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Anandaraj
For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.M.Rajarajan Additional Government Pleader
For R-3 : Mr.Aathimoolapandian
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous and he has also sent an E-mail to that effect to the E- mail ID mentioned in the cause list.
1/2
W.P(MD).No.9975 of 2019
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well the E-mail, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
tsg
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Regional Municipal Administration Office, Trivandrum Road, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.
2.The District Collector, District Collectorate, K.P.Road, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
W.P(MD).No.9975 of 2019 02.11.2020
CK(CO) TR(11.11.2020) 2P 3C
2/2
N.Devaraj
The Regional Director of Municipal Administration
The District Collector
The Commissioner, Kulithurai Corporation
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
