Dismissed

T.Balagurunathan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer/

Madras HC23 Sept 2020WP(MD)/9742/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking issuance of a Hindu Malaivedan Community Certificate for the petitioner's daughter as infructuous. The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the State Level Scrutiny Committee against the rejection order within three weeks and ordered the Committee to dispose of the appeal within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as infructuous; petitioner directed to file appeal before State Level Scrutiny Committee; Committee directed to dispose within eight weeks.

T.Balagurunathan Vs The Revenue… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.9742 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.09.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.9742 of 2020 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)No.8747 of 2020

T.Balagurunathan

...Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer / District Adi-Dravidar Welfare Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

¶12

2.The Principal / Head of Institution, Kendriya Vidyalaya Senior Secondary School, Opp. To Kattupillaiyar Kovil, PT Rajan Road, B.B.Kulam, Narimedu, Madurai-625 002. ...Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue Community Certificate to the petitioner's daughters namely B.Teja Sri and B.Sri Shivani on the basis of the petitioner's application dated 09.10.2019 within a period of time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ponniah For R1 : Mr.M.Muthugeethaiyan, Special Government Pleader. For R2 : Mr.E.T.Rajendran, Standing Counsel.

¶15

ORDER

¶16

[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., ]

¶17

The matter in issue pertains to issuance of HinduMalaivedan Community Certificate in favour of the daughter of the petitioner, who got admission in 1^st Standard in the second respondent school.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

W.P.(MD) No.9742 of 2020

¶21

2.When the matter was listed on 20.08.2020, the learned Special Government Pleader as well as the learned Assistant Solicitor General accepted notice for the respondents and prayed for time to get instructions.

¶22

3.The second respondent has filed counter-affidavit, stating that in the light of the subsequent development, nothing remains for further adjudication in the Writ Petition.

¶23

4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent would submit that the request made by the petitioner for issuance of Community Certificate to his daughter came to be rejected by the first respondent, vide proceedings dated 21.08.2020 and the remedy open to the petitioner, if any, is to make a challenge by filing an appeal before the State Level Scrutiny Committee.

¶24

5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the second respondent to provisionally admit her daughter.

¶25

6.The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that since the production of the community certificate is mandatory one, it cannot be waived.

¶26

7.This Court has considered the rival submissions. In the light of the said development, nothing remains for further adjudication in this Writ Petition and therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the State Level Scrutiny Committee by making challenge to the order dated 21.08.2020 passed by the first respondent, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and upon receipt of the same, the State Level Scrutiny Committee is directed to entertain the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order and accord priority and dispose of the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than eight (8) weeks thereafter and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner. The Registry is directed to mark a copy of this order to the State Level Scrutiny Committee. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶31

2/3

¶32

W.P.(MD) No.9742 of 2020

¶33

Myr

¶34

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶35

¶36

1.The Chairman, State Level Scrutiny Committee-II / Additional Secretary to Government, Adidravidar and Tribal Welfare (CV3) Department, Chennai-600 009.

¶37

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer / District Adi-Dravidar Welfare Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-17965[F] dated 24/09/2020 )

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.E.T. RAJENDRAN, Advocate ( SR-17909[F] dated 24/09/2020 )

¶40

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.9742 of 2020 23.09.2020

¶41

NS(CO) TR(06.10.2020) 3P 5C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

3/3

T.Balagurunathan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Balagurunathan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary to Government Vs F.Babu

The District Elementary Education Officer, Vs G. Sumathi Thangapackiam

S.Gobinath Vs G.Rajabharathi

V.Jeya Kumar Vs the Principal Secretary to Government

V.Murugesan @ Murgesapandi Vs The District Collector

Mala Vs the Dist. Collector