Petitioner challenged a Tender Notification via writ petition. The respondents informed the court the tender had been withdrawn. The court recorded the submission and closed the petition and connected miscellaneous applications without costs.
None granted as the impugned tender notification was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.9250 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.08.2020
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.9250 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8434 to 8436 of 2020
Pandiammal : Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner cum Tender inviting Authority, Usilampatty Panchayat Union, Usilampatty, Madurai District.
2.The Chairman, Usilampatty Panchayat Union, Usilampatty, Madurai District. : Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Tender Notice in Na.Ka/No.1127/2020/A2 dated 03.08.2020 issued by the first respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to conduct free and fair Tender by issuing fresh Tender Notice after re-estimation of works to fix proper estimated cost and with proper publication and without any hindrance to anybody desirous from participating in Tender in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ayngaraprabhu For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan Government Advocate
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
2.The learned counsel would challenge the impugned Tender notification on various grounds. Before he could proceed further, the learned Government Advocate informed the Court that the impugned tender notification has already been withdrawn, therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.9250 of 2020
3.Recording the said submission of the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
dss/ias
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
W.P.(MD)No.9250 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8434 to 8436 of 2020 13.08.2020
CS (24.08.2020) 2P 3C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the impugned Tender Notification requires further adjudication given its withdrawal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pandiammal
The Commissioner cum Tender inviting Authority, Usilampatty Panchayat Union, Usilampatty, Madurai District
The Chairman, Usilampatty Panchayat Union, Usilampatty, Madurai District
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
