Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing police officers to investigate a third respondent for corruption. The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with liberty to pursue remedies elsewhere.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to work out remedy before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.9158 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.08.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.9158 of 2020
P.Lakshmi
... Petitioner
versus
Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 627 002.
The Inspector of Police, Valliyor Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of mandamus, to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to investigate further action against the 5th respondent, Mr.N.Tiruppathi, the Inspector of Police, Valliyor Police Station, Tirunelveli District, under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 on the petitioner's petition dated 10.06.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ with liberty to work out his remedy before the appropriate Forum.
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.9158 of 2020
He also undertakes to circulate a letter for withdrawing this petition to the Registry.
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
ogy
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli – 627 002.
Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 627 002.
+1 CC to Mr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, Advocate ( SR-14069[F] dated 14/08/2020 )
W.P.(MD)No.9158 of 2020 13.08.2020
KM (15.09.2020) 2P 6C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Lakshmi
The Director General of Police
The Superintendent of Police
The Deputy Superintendent of Police
The Inspector of Police
N.Thiruppathi
B. Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
