Allowed

P.Naresh Ambedkar v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC15 Oct 2020WP(MD)/8344/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction under Article 226 to transfer property tax in the petitioner's name following an online application submitted after a previous court order. The court directed the respondent to consider the application and pass orders on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Director the respondent to consider the online application and pass orders on merits within four weeks.

P.Naresh Ambedkar Vs The Assistant Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.8344 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.10.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.8344 of 2020

P.Naresh Ambedkar

: Petitioner

Vs.

The Assistant Commissioner, Palayamkottai Ward Office, Tirunelveli Corporation, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. : Respondent

¶7

PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to transfer property tax in the petitioner's name for assessment Number 146/024/00183 for the petitioner's house in Door No.17A, Sivan South Car Street, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli based on the petitioner's representation, dated 03.07.2020.

¶8

For Petitioner :Mr.T.Selvan For Respondent :Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Standing Counsel

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to direct the respondent to transfer the property tax in the petitioner's name for the Assessment Number 146/024/00183 for the petitioner's house in Door No.17A, Sivan South Car Street, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli based on the petitioner's representation, dated 03.07.2020.

¶11

2.Heard Mr.T.Selvan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶12

3.On the last hearing date, ie., on 30.07.2020, this Court had directed the petitioner to submit online application for transfer of property tax in his name for the aforementioned property. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that as per the direction issued by this Court, dated 30.07.2020, the petitioner has submitted the online application for transfer of property tax in his name for the Assessment No.146/024/00183.

¶13

4.The relief sought for in this Writ Petition is an innocuous relief. No prejudice will be caused to the respondent, if the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ relief sought for in this Writ Petition is granted by this Court.

¶14

1/2

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.8344 of 2020

¶16

The only reason for not entertaining the application of the petitioner earlier by the respondent was that the petitioner had not submitted the application through online, but had submitted the application through offline.

¶17

5.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioner's online application seeking for transfer of property tax in the petitioner's name for the Assessment Number 146/024/00183 for the petitioner's house in Door No.17A, Sivan South Car Street, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

6.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, there is no order as to costs.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

Cmr

¶23

¶24

The Assistant Commissioner, Palayamkottai Ward Office, Tirunelveli Corporation, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

¶25

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.8344 of 2020 15.10.2020

¶26

DKS(CO) KM (06.11.2020) 2P 2C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/2

P.Naresh Ambedkar v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Naresh Ambedkar v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan Vs the Assistant Director

R. Lakshmi, W/O.R.Rathinam, Vs the Executive Engineer

Devaki Veeraiyan Vs the District Collector Cum-`

Cms Evangelical Suvi David Vs the District Registrar

N. Namasivayam Vs the Secretary

Ganesan Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer