Ramar v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition seeking mandamus for issuance of Hindu Scheduled Tribes Malaivedan Community certificate. Court dismissed petition as infructuous after second respondent issued rejecting orders.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; petitioner at liberty to challenge the proceeding orders of the second respondent.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD)No.772 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
W.P.(MD)No.772 of 2020
Ramar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chairman,
State Level Scrutiny Committee II, Additional Secretary to Government,
Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare(CV3) Department, Secretariat, Chennai.
2.The Chairman District Level
Scrutiny Committee cum District Collector, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare (CV3) Department, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramar
- respondent
The Chairman, District Level Scrutiny Committee cum District Collector, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Dep., Dindigul
Coram
M.Sathyananathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court