Petitioner challenging a temporary shift to a different shop due to COVID-19 restrictions. Court disposed of PIL as grievance addressed by order.
Writ petition disposed of; no further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.6378 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.06.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
W.P.(MD)No.6378 of 2020
M.K.Rajan
... Petitioner
vs.
Madurai District, Madurai.
Madurai Corporation,
Madurai.
Revenue Department, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents permit petitioner doing the whole sale fruit merchant business at shop No.140 at Mattuthavani Fruit Market, Madurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi
For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan,
Government Advocate for R1 Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohaideen, Standing counsel for R2 and R3
O R D E R
This Court deeply appreciates the presence of Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohaideen, learned Standing counsel, for taken notice on behalf of the 2nd and 3rd respondents, and Mr.A.Thiyagarajan, Government Advocate, who had taken notice for the 1st respondent.
1/3
W.P.(MD)No.6378 of 2020
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
To
2/3
W.P.(MD)No.6378 of 2020
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.K.Rajan
The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.
The Assistant Commissioner, Revenue Department, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
