Disposed

M/s.Indiana Minerals and Allied Industries v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Mar 2020WP(MD)/4885/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 sought a direction to allow trucks to transport building raw materials. The court directed the Assistant Director of Mines to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the transportation of armour rocks to Vizhinjam Port Site and pass a reasoned order by a specified date, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, examine records, and pass a reasoned order by 09.04.2020.

M/s.Indiana Minerals and Allied Industries Vs The… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 09.03.2020

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P(MD) No.4885 of 2020

¶7

and WMP(MD) No. 4252 of 2020

¶8

M/s.Indiana Minerals and Allied Industries,

¶9

No.6/229, Near Om Sakthi Nagar,

¶10

O. Rajapalayam Post, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu – 637 209.

¶11

... Petitioner

¶12

Vs.

¶13

The District Collector, Kannyakumari District.

¶14

The Superintendent of Police, Kannyakumari District.

¶15

The Assistant Director of Mines, Nagercoil, Kannyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, or direction, directing the respondents to allow trucks belongs to the petitioner's company for transporting the building raw materials accompanied with valid and legal documents without any disturbance by the respondents on the basis of the representation dated 22.2.2020.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S. Sivaprakash For Respondents : Mr.C. Mari Chelliah Prabhu Additional Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The Writ of Mandamus filed seeking direction to allow trucks belonging to the petitioner's company to transport, what the petitioner has described as building raw materials, but what are actually armour rock materials to Vizhinjam Port Site in Kerala. The petitioner had also given a representation, dated 22.2.2020.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would

¶24

states that the relief could be restricted, seeking a direction to the respondents to pass order on the petitioner's representation, dated 22.02.2020.

¶25

In view of that fact, it may be inappropriate on the part

¶26

of this Court to go into the averments made in detail, since that will have to be decided by the appropriate authorities. Therefore, direction is issued to the third respondent/The Assistant Director of Mines, Nagercoil, Kannyakumari District, to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.02.2020, after issuing notice to the petitioner, examine the records, examine the necessity of transportation of armour rocks from the place of the Crusher to the Vizhinjam Port Site and also all other relevant facts and thereafter, pass an order with reasons. The said order may be passed, on or before 09.04.2020.

¶27

With the above directions, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(P & A)

// True Copy //

ksa

The District Collector, Kannyakumari District.

¶34

The Superintendent of Police,

¶35

Kannyakumari District.

¶36

The Assistant Director of Mines,

¶37

Nagercoil, Kannyakumari District.

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.S.SIVAPRAKASH, Advocate ( SR-10529[F] dated 09/03/2020 )

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-11100[F] dated 11/03/2020 )

¶40

W.P(MD) No.4885 of 2020 09.03.2020

¶41

SBS(CO)

¶42

TR(11.03.2020)2P 6C

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶44

2/2

M/s.Indiana Minerals and Allied Industries v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Indiana Minerals and Allied Industries v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Kumar Srinivasan Vs the Regional Passport Officer

A.Poovan Vs the Special Officer/ the District Revenue Officer

V.Maheswari Vs the Tahsildar

G.Rajasekaran Vs The District Collector

Leelavathi Vs The District Collector

M.Suresh Vs The Deputy Registrar of Co-op. Societies