Disposed

R.Senthil v. The Regional transport Officer

Madras HC6 Mar 2020WP(MD)/4820/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for directions to register a lost motor vehicle. Court directed petitioner to visit the office, comply with formalities, and produce documents for the file to be considered. Petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to visit respondent office within 7 days to comply with formalities; respondents to pass orders on representation if petitioner complies.

R.Senthil Vs The Regional transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.4820 of 2020

¶2

R.Senthil

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.03.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD)No.4820 of 2020

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The Regional Transport Officer,

¶9

1^st Floor, N.G.O. Colony,

¶10

Tirunelveli District.

¶11

2.The Deputy Transport Commissioner, 1^st Floor, N.G.O. Colony, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to register petitioner's Royal Enfield Motor Cycle having temporary registration No.TN 72 TMP 63935 within a stipulated time as directed by this Court by considering petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2019.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, Special Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This writ petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus, seeking a direction to the respondents, namely, the Regional Transport Officer, Tirunelveli and the Deputy Transport Commissioner, Tirunelveli, to pass some orders on his representation, dated 26.07.2019.

¶16

2.The petitioner had purchased a Royal Enfield Motor Cycle having Temporary Registration No.TN 72 TMP 63935. Unfortunately, the petitioner had lost the Form No.20. He had sent a representation dated 26.07.2019, seeking registration of the said vehicle.

¶17

3.Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶18

4.It is stated that the Form No.20 is available online and the petitioner can download the form and submit his application for registration. The petitioner to also explain whether he had given any police complaint for lost of Form No.20. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P(MD)No.4820 of 2020

¶21

In view of all these facts, the petitioner may make a short visit to the Office of the first respondent and comply with the formalities as required by the first respondent. Unless the petitioner complies with the same, the respondent may not be able to register the vehicle. Therefore, in order to prove the loss and ownership, complaint is necessary. Thereafter, the respondents may pass orders on his representation dated 26.07.2019.

¶22

In the first instance, the petitioner may go over to the office of the first respondent on 13.03.2020 between 11.00 a.m and 12.00 noon and on that date, the first respondent may instruct the petitioner to produce the necessary documents. If the petitioner complies with the same, the respondent pass orders on the representation, dated 26.07.2019, on or before 15.04.2020.

¶23

7.With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

// True Copy //

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶28

¶29

¶30

1.The Regional Transport Officer,

¶31

1^st Floor, N.G.O. Colony, Tirunelveli District.

¶32

2.The Deputy Transport Commissioner,

¶33

1^st Floor, N.G.O. Colony, Tirunelveli District.

¶34

+1 CC to SPL.GP ( SR-10559[F] dated 09/03/2020 )

¶35

+1 CC to Mr.S.R.ANBARASU, Advocate ( SR-10628[F] dated 09/03/2020 )

¶36

W.P(MD)No.4820 of 2020

¶37

06.03.2020

¶38

MK (12.03.2020) 2P 5C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

2/2

R.Senthil v. The Regional transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Senthil v. The Regional transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Kalidoss, S/O.T.Arumugam Vs the Joint Commissioner /

T.P.Selvaraj Vs the Commissioner

P.Palanisamy Vs the District Collector

Niranjan Kumar Srinivasan Vs the Regional Passport Officer

A.Poovan Vs the Special Officer/ the District Revenue Officer

V.Maheswari Vs the Tahsildar