Allowed

I.Stephen Saravanan v. the District Collector

Madras HC21 Feb 2020WP(MD)/4431/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court was asked to direct respondents to consider a representation for constructing a Church. The Court directed the first respondent to consider the representation within twelve weeks and pass orders in accordance with law, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.10.2015 and pass appropriate orders on merits within twelve weeks.

I.Stephen Saravanan Vs the District Collector — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.4431 of 2016

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 21.02.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.4431 of 2016

¶7

J.Stephen Saravanan ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶10

2.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, The Assistant Director of Panchayat Office, Dindigul.

¶11

3.The Panchayat President, Sevagampatti Town Panchayat, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶12

4.The Executive Officer, Sevagampatti Town Panchayat, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 29.10.2015 and to direct the respondents to sanction plan and approval for the construction of the Church in S.No.766/3B, which is situated in the Sevagampatti Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Samuel James Devasagayam

¶15

For R1to R4 : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan Government Advocate

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This Writ Petition is filed for issuing a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/3

¶19

W.P.(MD)No.4431 of 2016

¶20

representation, dated 29.10.2015 and to direct the respondents to sanction plan and approval for the construction of the Church in S.No.766/3B, which is situated in the Sevagampatti Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶21

2.The petitioner states that he is a Pastor of a Church, known as “Believer's Church” and that the religious congregation of the petitioner has acquired a property measuring to an extent of 22 cents. The petitioner states that he applied for approval and plan permission for the Church proposed to be constructed by the petitioner and that said request was not considered by the respondent all along.

¶22

3.The representation was submitted by the petitioner on 29.10.2015. Though the Writ Petition is of the year 2016, the respondents have not responded to the request of the petitioner for a long time. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate order within the time stipulated by this Court

¶23

4.Since the petitioner is seeking approval for construction of a Church, this Court is of the view that the respondents should consider the petitioner's request and to decide whether the petitioner can be permitted to put up construction. Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation, this Court is inclined to pass the following direction:-

¶24

5.The first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.10.2015 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving opportunity to the petitioner as well as the others living in the village.

¶25

6.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/3

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.4431 of 2016

¶33

2.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, The Assistant Director of Panchayat Office, Dindigul.

¶34

3.The Panchayat President, Sevagampatti Town Panchayat, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. 4.The Executive Officer, Sevagampatti Town Panchayat, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶35

+1 CC to M/s.Special Govt.Pleader ( SR-7783[F]

¶36

+1 CC to M/s.SAMUVEL JAMES DEVA SAGAYAM, Advocate ( SR-7892[F]

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.4431 of 2016 21.02.2020

¶38

cmr SDS (06.03.2020) 3P-7C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

3/3

I.Stephen Saravanan v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

I.Stephen Saravanan v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Ganesan Vs M.Lakshmi

R.Srikumar Vs G. Gopinath

K.R.Thineshkumar Vs J.Jeyakanthan I.A.S

M.Prabaharan Vs The District Registrar

Dr.R. Vedasalam, Vs the District Collector

S.Pavalakodi Vs the Distric Collector