Kasthuri v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ of mandamus for repatriation of husband from China via representation before the Court. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted.
What did the court decide?
The instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
What the court decided
W.P(MD) No.4423 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.03.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P(MD) No.4423 of 2020
Kasthuri
... Petitioner
Vs.
- Union of India Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of External Affairs, South Block, Rasina Hill, New Delhi – 110011. 2. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents-1 & 2 to rescue and repatriate the petitioner's husband namely Manikandan and facilitate the safe return from China to India immediately, based on the petitioner representation made by the petitioner dated on 10.02.2020 to all the respondents and earlier representation given by the petitioner's husband on 29.01.2020 to Embassy of India Beijing, China within a time stipulated by this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kasthuri
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
District Collector
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court