The Madurai Bench dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner failed to produce any assignment document in his name. The court held it is open for a fresh petition if title documents are subsequently produced. No costs awarded.
Writ of Mandamus dismissed; petitioner directed to file fresh petition if title documents are available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.3878 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.02.2020 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
W.P.(MD).No.3878 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD).No.3273 of 2020
P.Annakamu .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Land Administrative Commissioner, Land Administrative Commissioner Office,
Ezhiligam, Chepauk, Chennai.
2.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Dindigul.
Collectorate Campus, Dindigul District.
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul District.
5.The Block Development Officer,
Block Development Office, Sannarpatti, Dindigul District.
6.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Dindigul East, Dindigul District.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation, dated 26.12.2018 within a stipulated period.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Illanchezian For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthu Karuppan for R1 to R6 Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation, dated 26.12.2018 within a stipulated period. In the representation, the petitioner has made general statements regarding cancellation of certain assignments.
1/2
W.P.(MD).No.3878 of 2020
2.The petitioner has not produced any document of assignment in his name. It is not known as to how the petitioner is entitled to claim right under one Packiyam who is said to be one of the original assignees.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CRL.SIDE)
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
TM
To
1.The Land Administrative Commissioner, Land Administrative Commissioner Office, Ezhiligam, Chepauk, Chennai.
2.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Dindigul.
5.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Sannarpatti, Dindigul District.
6.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Dindigul East, Dindigul District. +1 CC to MR.V.ILLANCHEZIAN, Advocate ( SR-8440[F] dated 26/02/2020 ) W.P.(MD).No.3878 of 2020 26.02.2020
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ MK (12.03.2020) 2P 8C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents to consider a representation regarding land assignment.
Whether the petitioner can establish title to claim rights under an assignment without producing documentary evidence.
P.Annakamu
The Land Administrative Commissioner
The District Collector
The District Revenue Officer
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Block Development Officer
S.S. SUNDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
