In this writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash police proceedings and grant permission for a Kabadi tournament, the court accepted the petitioner's submission that the prayer had become infructuous and dismissed the petition.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.248 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 26.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.(MD)No.248 of 2015
S.Marimuthu
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the Sub Inspector of Police, Seithur, Virudhunagar District, the 2nd respondent herein made in NAMUNA dated 31.12.2014 and quash the same and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission to the petitioner for conducting Kabadi Tournament on 10.01.2015 in the name of the Red Rose & Subash Kabadi Team at Seithur, Virudhunagar District.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Marimuthu
For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings of the Sub Inspector of Police, Seithur, Virudhunagar District / 2nd respondent herein made in NAMUNA dated 31.12.2014 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission to the petitioner for conducting Kabadi Tournament on 10.01.2015 in the name of the Red Rose & Subash Kabadi Team at Seithur, Virudhunagar District.
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.248 of 2015
// True Copy //
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
W.P.(MD)No.248 of 2015 26.11.2020
dss
AE/ (18/01/2021) 2P / 3C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Marimuthu
Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District
Sub Inspector of Police, Seithur Police Station
G.K.Ilantiraiyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
