Disposed

T.Lingesh v. The Secretary to Govt.

Madras HC13 Feb 2020WP(MD)/2165/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions sought mandamus for extending fishpond leases by six months. The court held that extension is not possible per existing government orders requiring auction. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation, ensure the application is not rejected on flimsy grounds, and fix the upset price via Assistant Engineer.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioners' representation, not reject application on flimsy grounds, and fix upset price via Assistant Engineer.

T.Lingesh Vs The Secretary to Govt. — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

WP(MD) No.2165 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.02.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P(MD)Nos.2165 to 2167 of 2020

¶5

T.Lingesh ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.2165 of 2020 A.Thangasamy ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.2166 of 2020 G.Jeyaraj ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)

¶6

No.2167 of 2020

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Fort St.George,

¶9

Chennai 600 009

¶10

The Director of Fisheries, Directorate of Fisheries Administrative Office Buildings, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai.

¶11

1. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District.

¶12

The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Distillery Road, Vadaseri, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

¶14

The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶15

Therur Thenkumari Inland Fisherman Co-operative Society Limited No.FNL 9, Rep. by its President, Theroor, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents in all W.P.'s https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/3

¶17

WP(MD) No.2165 of 2020

¶18

COMMON PRAYER : Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.3 to 5 to consider the petitioners' representation dated 20.01.2020 in accordance with law within a stipulated time period and consequently direct them to extend the lease period for the Paneerkundukulam Pond, Ramanputhurkulam, Senkulam and Chettikulam Alagappanpuram pond respectively by a period of 6 months i.e. till 30.06.2020 thereby enabling the petitioners to harvest his fishes.

¶19

In all the cases:

¶20

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶21

Since the issue involved in all the cases are one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order. By consent, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶22

Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 6.

¶23

These writ petitions are filed seeking for a Mandamus, directing the respondents No.3 to 5 to consider the petitioners' representation dated 20.01.2020 in accordance with law within a stipulated time period and consequently direct them to extend the lease period for the Paneerkundukulam Pond, Ramanputhurkulam, Senkulam and Chettikulam Alagappanpuram pond respectively by a period of 6 months i.e. till 30.06.2020 thereby enabling the petitioners to harvest the fish.

¶24

In view of G.O.Ms.No.16, Public Works Department, dated 14.01.2011, the extension of lease is not possible. The learned Government Advocate, upon instructions states that, the Assistant Engineer has sent a proposal for fixing the upset price. After some time, auction notice will be announced. It is also open to the petitioner to take part in the auction that may be announced as and when the notification is issued. It is made very clear that the petitioners' application should not be rejected on flimsy grounds.

¶25

With these directions, the writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

¶26

Assistant Registrar (records)

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/3

¶31

WP(MD) No.2165 of 2020

¶32

Sts

¶33

To:

¶34

1)	The Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009
2)	The Director of Fisheries, Directorate of Fisheries Administrative Office Buildings, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai.
3)	The District Collector, Kanyakumari District.
4)	The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Distillery Road, Vadaseri,
	Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
5)	The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
6)	The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
+1	CC to SPL.GP ( SR-6320[F] dated 14/02/2020 )
+1 13/	CC to Mr.C.MUTHUSARAVANAN, Advocate (SR-6221[F] dated 02/2020 )
	Common Order made in W.P(MD)Nos.2165 to 2167 of 2020
	13.02.2020
MK	(18.03.2020) 3P 9C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

3/3

T.Lingesh v. The Secretary to Govt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Lingesh v. The Secretary to Govt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sundari Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M.Jeyapandi Vs The Commissioner

S.BoobeshDasrath Vs The Dean

M. Soosai Raj Vs the Managing Director

Raja Vs the Regional Passport Officer

P.Savithiri Vs State of Tamil Nadu