3.It is the case of the petitioner that the third respondent was earlier acted as the office bearer of the society. The petitioner has produced before this Court the sale deed and exchange deed, dated 20.06.2003 to show that the property was purchased by the trustee on behalf of the Christian Brethern Assembly, the religious institution. Stating that the third respondent was removed from the society along with some other persons due to their illegal activities and that the third respondent has formed a rival organisation under the name of Arulatchi Christian Brethern Trust, the petitioner submitted a representation before the second respondent not to register any trust. It is the case of petitioner that the third respondent in order to grab the properties of the petitioner's Church, has formed a new trust as a family trust and that he has also shown the properties of Christian Brethern Assembly as properties belonging to the said trust proposed to be registered. It is further stated that the third respondent has earlier filed a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.19747 of 2019, suppressing material facts for the relief of a positive direction to the second respondent to register the trust deed. Since this Court also has directed the second respondent to consider the registration of trust, the petitioner states that the registration of another trust showing the properties of petitioner's trust will cause serious hardship to the petitioner. In order to avoid the property of the trust being made litigious, the petitioner states that the prayer in the writ petition should be allowed.
