Dismissed

P.Velusamy v. The District Collector

Madras HC14 Oct 2020WP(MD)/14347/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of an eviction order dated 06.10.2020 issued pursuant to previous writ orders directing removal of encroachments, as the petitioner offered no reasons for interference. Connected petitions were also dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petition and connected miscellaneous petitions dismissed; authorities allowed to proceed with the eviction order.

P.Velusamy Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.14347 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 14.10.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.14347 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.11994 and 11996 of 2020

¶8

P.Velusamy ... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶11

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue Division, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶12

The Tahsildar, Oddanchathiram Taluk Office, Oddanchathiram, Dindigul District.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Oddanchathiram Panchayat Union, Oddanchathiram, Dindigul District.

¶14

The President, Vadakadu Village Panchayat, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents

¶15

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the 5^th respondent dated 06.10.2020 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently forbear the respondents 1 to 5 from in anyway constructing any water storage tank by laying the

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/4

¶18

W.P.(MD)No.14347 of 2020

¶19

water channel through the petitioner's property measuring about 2.31.0 hectares situated in Survey No.36/1 of Vadakadu Village, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the proceedings issued by the 3^rd respondent in Na.Ka. /2002/B3 dated 24.12.2003.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Gangai Amaran

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.R.Murugan,

¶22

Additional Government Pleader

¶23

ORDER

¶24

[Order of the Court was made by B.PUGALENDHI, J. ]

¶25

The impugned order is an order of eviction issued to the petitioner pursuant to the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)Nos.5483 and 5488 of 2020.

¶26

The petitioner has earlier filed a writ petition in W.P. (MD)No.5788 of 2020 and the same was taken up along with W.P.(MD) Nos.5483 and 5488 of 2020 and by a common order dated 16.03.2020, this Court has passed an order, directing the authorities to take appropriate action to remove the encroachments. Pursuant to the said order of this Court, the impugned order came to be passed and the petitioner has not stated any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed and the authorities can proceed with the impugned order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.

¶27

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

The District Collector, Dindigul District, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Dindigul.

¶30

2/4

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.14347 of 2020

¶32

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue Division, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶33

The Tahsildar, Oddanchathiram Taluk Office, Oddanchathiram, Dindigul District.

¶34

The Block Development Officer, Oddanchathiram Panchayat Union, Oddanchathiram, Dindigul District.

¶35

The President, Vadakadu Village Panchayat, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶36

W.P.(MD)No.14347 of 2020

¶37

14.10.2020

¶38

ogy SDS (29.10.2020) 3P-6C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

3/4

P.Velusamy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Velusamy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Malathi Vs the District Collector

M.Vadivel Vs the District Collector

M.Chinnathai Vs the District Collector

S.P.Kannan Vs the Election Commissioner

Prem Ananth Vs The Regional Manager

O.M.a.Udhuman Mydeen, Vs Mr.Jainulavudeen, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board