A writ petition challenging the non-conduct of a tender for shop auctions was dismissed as withdrawn by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The petitioner had sought a writ of mandamus to direct the Town Panchayat Commissioner to conduct an auction and permit his participation.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.1291 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.03.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD)No.1291 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD)No.1043 of 2020
M.Ravi ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The District Collector, (Village Development), Dindigul. 2.The Commissioner, Town Panchayat, Union Office, Dindigul District. 3.The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Union Office, Dindigul District. 4.Mohamed Esaq 5.Mohamed Kajamoideen 6.G.Eswari 7.Gopi ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to conduct and issue tender auction for the six shops behind Dindigul Panchayat Union Office, near Bus Stand, Dindigul by publication in well circulated Tamil Daily Newspaper and also permit the petitioner to participate in the tender auction according to the Tamil Nadu Tender Transparency Act 1998, and Rules 2000.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Suresh Kumar
1/3
W.P(MD)No.1291 of 2020
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.S.Dayalan Government Advocate *****
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to conduct and issue tender auction for the six shops behind Dindigul Panchayat Union Office, near Bus Stand, Dindigul by publication in well circulated Tamil Daily Newspaper and also permit the petitioner to participate in the tender auction according to the Tamil Nadu Tender Transparency Act 1998, and Rules 2000.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also circulated a letter to the Registry to that effect and additionally, he has also made the following endorsement :
“Letter given by the Petitioner to withdraw the writ petition No.1291 of 2020. Accordingly, the above Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn and the letter is given to the Learned Registrar Judicial today.”
Assistant Registrar(CS)
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
To
1.The District Collector, (Village Development), Dindigul.
2/3
W.P(MD)No.1291 of 2020
2.The Commissioner, Town Panchayat, Union Office, Dindigul District. 3.The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Union Office, Dindigul District. +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-10181[F] dated 05/03/2020 ) +1 CC to M/s.M.SURESH KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-10498[F] dated 06/03/2020 )
W.P(MD)No.1291 of 2020
04.03.2020
SPU(05.05.2020) 3P 6C
3/3
M. Ravi
The District Collector (Village Development), Dindigul
The Commissioner, Town Panchayat, Union Office, Dindigul District
M. Mohamed Esaq
M. Mohamed Kajamoideen
G. Eswari
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
