Disposed

C.Ramamoorthy v. The District Collector

Madras HC23 Nov 2020WP(MD)/12442/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai bench directed the Block Development Officer to consider the petitioner's representation for the restoration of a potable water connection illegally disconnected by village panchayat authorities allegedly due to electoral enmity.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to consider the representation and pass final orders within six weeks.

C.Ramamoorthy Vs The District Collector — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.12442 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 23.11.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.12442 of 2020 (Through Video Conference)

... Petitioner

C.Ramamoorthy

The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶10

1. The Assistant Director of Panchayats, Virudhunagar District,

¶11

Virudhunagar.

¶12

1. The Commissioner / Block Development Officer, Sattur Panchayat Union,

¶13

Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

¶14

Mrs.Sakkammal

¶15

Mr.Chellaperumal

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to direct the 4^th and 5^th respondents to reconnect the potable water connection to the petitioner's house bearing Door No.4/286, Koppayanayakkanpatti, Pappakudi Village Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District by considering his representation dated 21.08.2020.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Solaisamy

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to direct the respondents 4 & 5 to reconnect the potable water connection to the petitioner's house bearing Door No.4/286, Koppayanayakkanpatti, Pappakudi Village Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District by considering his representation dated 21.08.2020.

¶21

Mr.C.Ramar, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents 3, 4 and 5. By consent of both sides, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/3

¶23

W.P.(MD)No.12442 of 2020

¶24

this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶25

It is the case of the petitioner that the fourth respondent was elected as the Panchayat President for Pappakudi Village Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District and she took charge in the month of January 2020. It is also the case of the petitioner that the fifth respondent took charge as the Secretary of Pappakudi Village Panchayat and after taking charge, he showed enmity to the people who did not cast their votes to the fourth respondent.

¶26

It is the further case of the petitioner that the respondents 4 & 5 disconnected the water connections of people, who did not vote for the fifth respondent during the Panchayat Elections. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's water connection for his house at Door No.4/286, Koppayanayakkanpatti, Pappakudi Village Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District was also disconnected by the respondents 4 & 5 on 01.08.2020. According to the petitioner, he gave a representation on 21.08.2020 to the respondents 1 to 3 to restore his water connection. But till date, the said representation of the petitioner has not been considered by the respondents 1 to 3. In such circumstances, this writ petition has been filed.

¶27

Heard Mr.M.Solaisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Ramar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3, 4 & 5.

¶28

The relief sought for in this writ petition is an innocuous relief. No prejudice will be caused to any of the respondents if the relief sought for by the petitioner is granted by this Court.

¶29

It is his case that the water connection has been illegally disconnected at Door No.4/286, Koppayanayakkanpatti, Pappakudi Village Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. It is his case that only due to enmity against the people who did not cast votes to the fourth respondent in the Village Panchayat election, water connection was disconnected to them, which includes the petitioner. He has given a representation on 21.08.2020 to the respondents 1 to 3 for restoration of his water connection. Admittedly, till date, the said representation has not been considered by the respondents 1 to 3 on merits and in accordance with law.

¶30

For the forgoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.08.2020 seeking for restoration of his water connection to his house at Door No.4/286, Koppayanayakkanpatti, Pappakudi Village Panchayat, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District and pass final orders https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on merits and in accordance with law after hearing all the necessary

¶31

2/3

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.12442 of 2020

¶33

parties including the respondents 4 & 5 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶34

With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

Sd/Assistant Registrar (AS)

¶36

// True Copy //

¶37

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶38

sts

¶39

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

¶40

To 1) The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2) The Assistant Director of Panchayats, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶41

The Commissioner / Block Development Officer, Sattur Panchayat Union, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

¶42

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-22677[F] dated 24/11/2020 )

¶43

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.12442 of 2020 Dated: 23.11.2020

¶44

MJ(CO) AP(18/12/2020) 3P 5C

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

3/3

C.Ramamoorthy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Ramamoorthy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geetha Chellapandi Vs The Joint Commissioner

Sakthivel Vs the District Collector

Sri Subramanian Industries Vs the Principal Commissioner

Vijaya Bank, Trichy Branch, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

G.Jeyaraj,S/O.Gurusamy Gounder Vs the District Collector

Hajara Banu Vs the Superintending Engineer