A writ petition filed to direct the Chief Medical Officer to review adverse remarks in the petitioner's Annual Confidential Reports. The petitioner's counsel surrendered the petition stating the cause for filing had vanished, resulting in the petition being disposed of as infructuous.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.11437 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.11437 of 2011
Dr.A.Annadurai ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chairman, V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust, Tuticorin District.
2.The Chief Medical Officer, V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to review the adverse remarks in the petitioner's Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the year 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 in the light of the guidelines issued in O.M.No.21011/1/2010-Estt.A, dated 13.04.2010 and by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2010 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s Ajmal Associates For Respondents : No Appearance
ORDER
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made a submission that the cause arose for the purpose of filing the writ petition became vanished.
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.11437 of 2011
SSL
To
1.The Chairman, V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust, Tuticorin District.
2.The Chief Medical Officer, V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust, Tuticorin District.
+1 CC to Mr.S. YASWANTH, Advocate ( SR-19950[F] dated 13/10/2020 )
W.P.(MD)No.11437 of 2011 13.10.2020
SGS(CO) KM (21.10.2020) 2P 4C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be adjudicated on merits given the cause for filing had vanished.
Whether the writ petition challenging adverse remarks in Annual Confidential Reports should be disposed of as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr.A.Annadurai
The Chairman, V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust, Tuticorin District
The Chief Medical Officer, V.O.Chidambaram Port Trust, Tuticorin District
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
