Allowed

Tamilarasan v. the Deputy Director of Fisheries (Regional)

Madras HC11 Mar 2020WP(MD)/1122/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the delay by the Assistant Director of Fisheries in issuing a work order after successfully bidding for fishing rights. The court directed the second respondent to issue the work order within a week.

What did the court decide?

Directing the second respondent to issue work order to the petitioner on or before 20.03.2020 for the period 2020-2023.

Tamilarasan Vs the Deputy Director of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.03.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD)No.1122 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.897 of 2020

¶3

Tamilarasan : Petitioner Vs.

¶4

1.The Deputy Director of Fisheries, (Regional) Fisheries Department, Petchiamman Padithurai, Madurai.

¶5

2.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Inland Fishing Vaigai Dam, Theni District. : Respondents

¶6

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to issue the work order in favour of the petitioner pertaining to the Fishing Rights in Karugattankulam village tank, Theni District on the basis of the tender process held on 21.12.2018.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondents : Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, Special Government Pleader.

¶8

ORDER

¶9

Writ petition filed in the nature of the mandamus to direct the second respondent, the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Inland Fishing Vaigai Dam, Theni District to issue work order in favour of the petitioner, Tamilarasan, son of Mayakalai, residing at Tiruchendur, Kodangipatti Post, Theni District.

¶10

2.In the affidavit in support of the writ petition, it had been stated that the petitioner was a successful bidder in the tender notification issued by the second respondent dated 13.12.2018 for fishing rights in Karungattankulam village tank, Theni District on the basis of tender dated 21.12.2018 for the period 2019-2021. The petitioner quoted the highest amount of Rs.2,67,000/-. He had already deposited a sum of Rs.1,33,000/- on 21.12.2018. The second respondent on receipt of the said amount should have issued work order immediately. However, he had not issued work order fishing right for the year 2019-2021. Now one year has passed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

¶12

3.As a matter of fact, from the date of tender till the date of filing of the writ petition, 15 months have lapsed and the petitioner has not been issued with any work order. It is stated in the affidavit that a petition in W.P.(MD)No.1481 of 2019 was filed by one V.Jeyaraj regarding the same tender with reference to fishing rights, but, however, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by an order dated 08.11.2019. In view of these facts, the petitioner had approached this Court.

¶13

4.Internal communication, dated 31.01.2020 between the second respondent and the first respondent had been produced before this Court by the learned Special Government Pleader. In the internal communication, the second respondent sought one week time for grant of work order. however, it is acknowledged that till date work order had not been granted.

¶14

5.In view of above facts, the second respondent, Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Inland Fishing Vaigai Dam, Theni District, is directed to issue work order to the petitioner Tamilarasan, on or before 20.03.2020 for the period of 2020-2023 on the same terms, for which the petitioner had taken the fishing rights.

¶15

6.With the above observations, the writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶18

gns To

¶19

1.The Deputy Director of Fisheries, (Regional) Fisheries Department, Petchiamman Padithurai, Madurai.

¶20

2.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Inland Fishing Vaigai Dam, Theni District.

¶21

+1 CC to SPL.GP ( SR-11313[F] dated 12/03/2020 )

¶22

+1 CC to Mr.V.MALAIYENDRAN, Advocate (SR-11215[F]dated 11/03/2020 ) W.P.(MD)No.1122 of 2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 11.03.2020

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

VB(20.03.2020) 2P 5C

Tamilarasan v. the Deputy Director of Fisheries (Regional)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilarasan v. the Deputy Director of Fisheries (Regional)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Ali Vs the District Collector

K.Pandiyan Vs the Joint Commissioner

C.Stephen Vs the Regional Passport Officer

Karuppasamy Pandiyan Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

M.Jegatheesh Vs the District Collector

S.Ramesh Chandran Vs The Inspector General of Registration