The court noted that the petitioner received the entire tax refund sought, and held that the relief sought by way of mandamus was achieved. Consequently, the writ petition was closed with no costs awarded.
The writ petition was closed as the relief sought was already achieved by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.10.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P. No.9579 of 2020
M/s.Gemini Film Circuit,
Rep by its Partner, A. Sai Siva Jyothi, No 28, New Bangaru Colony, West KK Nagar,
Chennai- 78. ...Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Circle 10(6), 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. ...Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondent to consider the representation contained in the Petitioners letter to the respondent dated 28.5.2020 and to dispose of this Representation expeditiously in accordance with Law.
For Petitioner : Mr.Arun Karthik Mohan
For Respondent : Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan, Senior Standing Counsel
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the mandamus sought for has been achieved, insofar as the entire refund for the period in question has been received by the petitioner.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ska/vs
To
Income Tax Officer,
Non Corporate Circle 10(6),
121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.
W.P. No.9579 of 2020
SSD(CO)
KKV/09/12/2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Gemini Film Circuit
Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Circle 10(6)
Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
