Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging a Show Cause Notice via settlement. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn following the counsel's submission and endorsement regarding the Sabka Vikas Scheme.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P. No. 8504 of 2011
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2011
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Show Cause Notice No.347/2009 in C.No.IV/9/367/2008 STC ADJ dated 28.08.2009 issued by the Second Respondent.
For Petitioner : Ms. T.C.A. Sangeetha
For Respondents : Mr. V. Sundareswaran Standing Counsel
1/3
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition as the Petitioner has filed for settlement under the Sabka Vikas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2/3
W.P. No. 8504 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011
ssi(co)
aa19/03/2020
3/3
Madras Travels and Tours Pvt. Ltd.
Commissioner of Service Tax
Additional Commissioner of Service Tax
Deputy Commissioner of Service Tax
Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
