P.Murugan v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
This order closes a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking removal of a transformer. The court recorded the submission that the petitioner sold the land and no longer has a subsisting right, closing the petition without costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.10.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.8169 of 2015
P.Murugan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Teynampet, Chennai.
2.The Chief Engineer,
Office of the Chief Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Villupuram.
3.The Superintendent Engineer,
Electricity Board, Vengikal,
Capper Hills, Cuddalore – 4.
4.The Executive Engineer,
Operation and Maintenance,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Cuddalore.
5.The Divisional Engineer,
Office of the Divisional Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Periya Kovil Street,
Thirupapuliyur,
Cuddalore – 2.
6.The Assistant Divisional Engineer,
Office of the Assistant Divisional Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Cuddalore OT – 03.
7.The Junior Engineer,
Rural Section,
Office of the Junior Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Cuddalore OT – 03.
8.The Tahsildar,
Cuddalore. ... Respondents
(suo motu impleaded vide order dated 03.08.2015)
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to remove the transformer erected on the petitioner patta land.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Murugan
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Superintendent Engineer, Electricity Board
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court