V.Uma Anand v. The Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners withdrew Writ Petitions seeking mandamus for handover of title deeds relating to auction-purchased property. Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn without costs.
What did the court decide?
None; petitions dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.09.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.Nos.802 and 803 of 2016
V.Uma Anand ... Petitioner in W.P.No.802/2016 E.Suresh ... Petitioner in W.P.No.803/2016
Vs.
1.The Authorised Officer,
Indian Bank,
Vellore Circle Office,
No.45-51, TKM Complex,
Katpadi Road, Vellore – 4.
2.M/s.Envee Constructions,
No.9, 6 th Street,
T.N.Nagar, Palanipet,
Arakkonam, Vellore District,
rep by its Managing Director
Vasantha Venugopal. ... Respondents in both W.Ps
Prayer:Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to hand over the title deeds and other parent documents relating to the property purchased by the petitioner at the public auction conducted on 02.12.2011 and 29.12.2020 and the certificate of sale dated 04.03.2011 and 03.01.2011 issued by the 1st respondent in favour of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.Manoj (in both W.Ps) for Mr.K.Bijai Sundar For Respondents: Mr.Abdul Wahab (in both W.Ps) for M/s.K.V.Subramaniam Associates (R1) Mr.G.Jeremiah (R2) C O M M O N O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Uma Anand
- petitioner
E. Suresh
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, Vellore Circle Office
- respondent
M/s. Envee Constructions
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court