This order dismisses a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear on multiple listing dates, leading the court to dismiss the petition.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.09.2020
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.7352 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
S.K.Kalidoss Chettiyar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Building,
Chennai.
2.The Executive Engineer,
Corporation of Chennai,
Triplicane Zone
Chennai.
3.The Divisional Officer
Fire and Rescue Services Department,
Chennai City Central Region, Kilpauk,
Chennai 10.
4.The Executive Engineer
Tamilnadu Electricity Board,
Triplicane, Chennai 5.
5.A.Sivapandian
6.Shanmugam ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dt.18.02.2012 requesting to suspend the license issued to Sivapandian, 5th respondent herein, for running Tea Stall at 22/34, B.V. Naicken Street, Triplicane, Chennai 5 till the issuance of NOC by the 3rd Respondent.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For R1 and R2 : Mrs.Karthika Ashok Standing Counsel (Corporation)
For R3 : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar Standing Counsel (TNEB) For R5 : Mr.R.Neelakandan For R6 : No appearance
O R D E R
Consistently, there is no representation for the petitioner. When the matter was listed on 03.08.2020, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 24.08.2020. On 24.08.2020 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 04.09.2020. Similarly, on 04.09.2020 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 10.09.2020. On 10.09.2020 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 14.09.2020.
2.Though the matter has been printed under the caption “For dismissal”, today also, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this writ petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mkn
To
1.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Building,
Chennai.
2.The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Triplicane Zone Chennai.
3.The Divisional Officer,
Fire and Rescue Services Department,
Chennai City Central Region, Kilpauk,
Chennai 10.
4.The Executive Engineer
Tamilnadu Electricity Board,
Triplicane,
Chennai 5.
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No. 7352
W.P.No.7352 of 2012
CA(CO)
RMP(09/10/2020 )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner for suspension of a tea stall license should be allowed in the absence of representation.
S.K. Kalidoss Chettiyar
Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai
Divisional Officer, Fire and Rescue Services Department
Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board
A. Sivapandian
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
