The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition as infructuous, because the petitioner had endorsed its infructuous nature to the Court bundle.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous and connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.01.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P. No.4690 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Mrs.Meera D.Chinnadurai ... Petitioner Vs 1.Union of India, Represented by The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 011. 2.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman, 3079/3, Sadiq Nagar, JB Tito Marg, New Delhi – 110 049. 3.State Level Co-ordinator, IOCL, BPCL & HPCL Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Indian Oil Bhavan, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34. 4.Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (Marketing Division), Indane Area Office: 8/1079, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore 641 018. 5.M/s.Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai – 400 020. 1/3
6.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by is Chairman and Managing Director, Regd. Office: Bharat Bhavan,
4 & 6 Karimbhoy Road, Bulloud Estate, P.B. No.688, Mumbai – 400 001. .... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Proceedings of the Fourth respondent in REF.No.CBE/PL2/19 dated 18.01.2014 and quash the same with the consequential direction, directing the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's candidature and allow her to participate in the Draw selection proceedings for the award of LPG Distributorship and insist the same condition of owned/leased land, after succeed in the draw selection.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ravikumar For R1 : Served – No appearance for R2 to R6 : Mr.V.Anantha Natarajan ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous. He has made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi2/ah
To
1.The Secretary to Government of India, Union of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 011.
2/3
2.The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 3079/3, Sadiq Nagar, JB Tito Marg, New Delhi – 110 049. 3.State Level Co-ordinator, IOCL, BPCL & HPCL Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Indian Oil Bhavan, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34. 4.Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (Marketing Division), Indane Area Office: 8/1079, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore 641 018. 5.The Chairman and Managing Director, M/s.Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai – 400 020. 6.The Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Regd. Office: Bharat Bhavan, 4 & 6 Karimbhoy Road, Bulloud Estate, P.B. No.688, Mumbai – 400 001. +1cc to Mr.V.Anantha Natarajan, Advocate sr.6122 +1cc to Mr.V.Ravikumar, Advocate sr.5879 W.P. No.4690 of 2014 ssv(co) nr 25/02/2020
3/3
Mrs. Meera D. Chinnadurai
Union of India
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
State Level Co-ordinator, IOCL, BPCL & HPCL Tamil Nadu & Puducherry
Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
