Disposed

M.E. Gowri Sankar v. the Inspector General

Madras HC25 Aug 2020WP/35076/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226, the petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Sub Registrar to consider a representation halting registration of a Power of Attorney. The Court closed the petition as the power of attorney dated 13.12.2013 was cancelled by a registered deed dated 25.09.2014, leaving no substantive matter for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition closed; no costs awarded.

M.E. Gowri Sankar Vs the Inspector General — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.08.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.No.35076 of 2013

¶6

M.E. Gowri Sankar

¶7

... Petitioner v. 1. The Inspector General of Registrar, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

¶8

The District Registrar, 12, Chairman Chidambaram Street, West Shanmugapuram Colony, Villupuram – 605 602. 3. The Sub Registrar, No.1/1, Sannadi Street, Marakkanam – 605 303, Villupuram District. ... Respondents

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the written representation dated 17.12.2013 of the petitioner herein in accordance with law.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R. Ravindraram For Respondents : Mr.P.P. Purushothaman

¶11

Government Advocate

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the written representation dated 17.12.2013.

¶14

In the representation dated 17.12.2013, the petitioner called upon the 3^rd respondent, viz., the Sub Registrar, not to register any document pursuant to the deed of power of attorney dated 13.12.2013 registered as document No.3955 of 2013.

¶15

Mr.P.P. Purushothaman, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, submitted that subsequent to the representation dated 17.12.2013, the executant of the power of

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

attorney, viz., M.E. Sivagnana Sambandam, has cancelled the power of attorney by a registered cancellation deed dated 25.09.2014, registered as Document No.3176 of 2014 and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

¶18

Since the power of attorney deed itself was cancelled by the parties to the power of attorney, as rightly submitted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Inspector General of Registrar,
100, Santhome High Road,
Chennai – 600 028.
2. The District Registrar,
12, Chairman Chidambaram Street,
West Shanmugapuram Colony,
Villupuram – 605 602.
3. The Sub Registrar,
No.1/1, Sannadi Street,
Marakkanam – 605 303, Villupuram District.
+1cc to Government Pleader, Sr.28035/2020
W.P.No.35076 of 2013
RLD (CO)
RV (08/09/2020)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.E. Gowri Sankar v. the Inspector General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.E. Gowri Sankar v. the Inspector General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Munusamy Vs the District Revenue Officer

K.Rathinasabapathy Vs Mr.N.Palaniappan

Manesseh Vs the District Collector

`The Supreme Leasing and Vs the Collector

M. Seethalakshmi Vs the Secretary

K.P.Hemalatha, Vs Tamil Nadu Small Industries