The court addressed a writ petition seeking protection from dispossession of land. The petitioner claimed ownership and PPC holding. The respondents agreed not to dispossess without due process. The court accepted this submission and closed the writ petition.
Writ petition closed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.12.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.34380 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
M.Kavitha
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.
Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 015. ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property in survey No.12, Gowrivakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District, Plot No.1-A, Easwari Layout approved by Executive Officer, Senbakkam Village Panchayat.
For Petitioner : Mr.E.Felix Parthiban for M/s.S.Joel For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari,
Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property in Survey No.12, Gowrivakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District, Plot No.1-A, Easwari Layout approved by Executive Officer, Senbakkam Village Panchayat.
2.It is the apprehension of the petitioner that the respondents are taking coercive steps to dispossess the petitioner from her lands in Survey No.12. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the property and that she is also holding a valid patta in her name.
3.Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents shall not dispossess the petitioner except following due process of law.
4.Mr.E.Felix Parthiban, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader may be recorded and the Writ Petition may be closed.
5.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional
Government Pleader that the authorities shall not dispossess the
petitioner except following due process of law, the Writ
Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is also closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
va
To
1.The Principal Secretary to Government
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Highways and Minor Ports Department,
Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.
2.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department,
No.394/4, Construction and Maintenance,
Chennai Corporation Division,
Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 015.
+1cc to Mr.S.Joel, SR.No.39439
+1cc to Government Pleader, SR.No.39782
W.P.No.34380 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
KKV/09/12/2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Kavitha
Government of Tamil Nadu
Divisional Engineer, Highways Department
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
