Disposed

T.M.Margabandu v. the State of Tamiln Adu

Madras HC23 Nov 2020WP/29450/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar (second respondent) to survey and fix boundary stones for a private common pathway and drainage land. The Court directed the respondent to survey the land and pass appropriate orders after issuing notices and affording an opportunity of hearing, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the c

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to survey the land and fix boundary stones within four weeks.

T.M.Margabandu Vs the State of Tamiln Adu — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 23.11.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

W.P.No.29450 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 (Heard through VC)

¶6

T.M.Margabandu .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by The District Collector,
Vellore,
Vellore District.
2.The Tahsildar,
Arcot,
Vellore District.
3.The Executive Officer,
Thimiri Panchayat Union,
Arcot Taluk,
Vellore District.
4.P.Ramasamy
5.R.Settu .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second
respondent herein to survey and identify the boundaries of the
private common pathway and drainage land measuring 72 ft in
length (from North to South) and 3 ft in breadth (from East to
West) situate at Kumarasamy Street, Thimiri, Arcot Taluk,
Vellore District and fix boundary stones.

¶7

1/6

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arun Kumar For RR1 & 2 : Mr.MD.Ilayaraja Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.R.Govindasamy For R5 : Mr.P.Mani For R4 : Died

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

The petitioner has sought for a mandamus directing the second respondent herein to survey and identify the boundaries of the private common pathway and drainage land measuring 72 ft in length (from North to South) and 3 ft in breadth (from East to West) situate at Kumarasamy Street, Thimiri, Arcot Taluk, Vellore District and fix boundary stones.

¶12

The case of the petitioner is that there is a private common pathway and drainage in between the house of the petitioner and the house of the respondent Nos.4 and 5, measuring 72 ft in length (from North to South) and 3 ft in breadth (from East to West) situate at Kumarasamy Street, Thimiri, Arcot Taluk, Vellore District and the same is being used as their common pathway and also for drainage purpose. The said piece of land belongs to the petitioner and his family members. While so, the respondents 4 and 5 have been trying to enchroach the said private common pathway and drainage to utilize the same within their house construction area. Hence, the petitioner has approached the second respondent to measure the above said private common pathway and drainage land and also paid necessary charges for the same. In this regard, the petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondents 1 to 3. However, there has been no action on the representation till date. Hence, this petition.

¶13

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶14

It is stated that the fourth respondent is dead and the fifth respondent is the son of the deceased fourth respondent. The same is recorded.

¶15

2/6

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to survey and identify the boundaries of the private common pathway and drainage land and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the fifth respondent herein and also any other person interested in this regard and by affording them an opportunity of personal hearing or virtual hearing or otherwise, considering their written objections and after verifying the relevant documents, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

It is made clear that the second respondent should not insist on the revised payment of charges for executing the above said exercise.

¶19

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed
of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition
is closed.
8. Post the matter on 05.01.2021 'For Reporting Compliance'.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
rsi
To
1.The District Collector,
Vellore,
Vellore District.
2.The Tahsildar,
Arcot,
Vellore District.
3.The Executive Officer,
Thimiri Panchayat Union,
Arcot Taluk,
Vellore District.
W.P.No.29450 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
aa03/12/2020
3/6

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.M.Margabandu v. the State of Tamiln Adu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.M.Margabandu v. the State of Tamiln Adu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. R.Vijayakumar Vs The Managing Director

Vaheeda Vs Registrar of Companies

I.a.R.Pandian Vs The Managing Director

V.Natarajan Vs The District Collector

M/s.Hi-Tec Valves Vs The Government of India

P.Shenkoda Gounder Vs the District Collector