Dismissed
P.Senthilkumar v. the Asst. Commissioner of
Madras HCWP/29131/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2020
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.Nos.29131 & 29132 of 2013
&
M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013
1.P.Senthilkumar
2.T.Sangeetha : Petitioners in both W.Ps.
Vs.
1.The Asst. Commissioner of HR & CE,
Namakkal.
2.The Inspector of HR & CE,
Rasipuram,
Namakkal District.
3. The Sub-Registrar,
Rasipuram,
Namakkal District.
: Respondents in W.P.No.29131 of 2013
1. The District Revenue Office,
Namakkal.
2. The Sub-Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer,
Namakkal.
3. The Tahsildar,
Rasipuram.
Namakkal District.
4. The Asst. Commissioner of HR & CE,
Namakkal.
5. The Inspector of HR & CE,
Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
6.The Sub-Registrar, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
: Respondents in W.P.No.29132 of 2013
PRAYER in W.P.No.29131 of 2013: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Letter dt. 26.11.2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same, consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the documents in respect of the lands in comprised Survey No.63/2 in Molapalayam Village within the SubRegistration District of Rasipuram and Registration District of Namakkal, without insisting “No Objection Certificate” from HR & CE Department or any other officials.
PRAYER in W.P.No.29132 of 2013: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Pa.Mu.1966/2012/A6 dt. 05.07.2012 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same, as illegal, as “No Objection Certificate” is not required from the Revenue Authorities for registration of documents.
For Petitioners in both W.Ps.: No appearance For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.K.Ravikumar in W.P.No.29132 of 2013 Additional Government Pleader For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Venkatesan in W.P.No.29131 of 2013 & Government Advocate Respondents 4 & 5 in W.P.No.29132 of 2013
For Respondent 3 in : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, W.P.No.29131 of 2013 & Government Advocate Respondent 6 in W.P.No. 29132 of 2013 COMMON ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioners. Even on the last occasion i.e., on 02.01.2020, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners. It
can now be inferred that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting these writ petitions. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nl
To
1.The District Revenue Office,
Namakkal.
2.The Sub-Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer,
Namakkal.
3.The Tahsildar,
Rasipuram.
Namakkal District.
4.The Asst. Commissioner of HR & CE,
Namakkal.
5.The Inspector of HR & CE,
Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
6.The Sub-Registrar,
Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
+1cc to Government Pleader, SR.Nos.3605, 3539, 3187.
W.P.Nos.29131 & 29132 of 2013 GMR(CO) CSR: 14.02.2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Senthilkumar, T. Sangeetha
The Assistant Commissioner of HR & CE, Namakkal
The Inspector of HR & CE, Rasipuram
The Sub-Registrar, Rasipuram
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court