Dismissed

Andhra Bank v. Union Bank of India

Madras HC9 Nov 2020WP/259/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions filed by Andhra Bank were dismissed as withdrawn. The court directed the Registry to close a Tax Deduction Reference and issue payment of Rs.2.50 crores plus interest to Union Bank of India.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; direction to close TDR No.T18/MTDAD 0487845 and make payment of Rs.2.50 crores with accrued interest to Union Bank of India.

Andhra Bank Vs Union Bank of India — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED 09.11.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SATHYANARAYANAN

¶6

AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020
and W.M.P.Nos.307, 310 and 312 of 2020
Andhra Bank
Anna Nagar Branch,
rep.by its Chief Manager,
JA-995-A/New No.170, 2 nd Avenue,
Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. .. Petitioner
Versus
1.Union Bank of India
rep.by its Chief Manager,
No.12/13, Riaz Garden,
Kodambakkam High Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.

¶7

1/6

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020

¶10

2.M/s.Deen Dayal Medical and Educational Trust, No.5110, H-Block, 1^st Street, 12^th main road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600040.

¶11

3.Mr.T.D.Naidu

¶12

Chairman and Managing Trustee, M/s.Deen Dayal Medical and Educational Trust, No.5110, H-Block, 1^st Street, 12^th main road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600040.

¶13

4.Mrs.T.D.Prabavathi
5.Ms.T.D.Sonia
6.The Registrar,
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai. .. Respondents

¶14

Prayer:- Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned order dated 27.11.2019 passed in RA.Nos.51 & 144 of 2019 on the file of the 6^th respondent and quash the same and consequentially allow the appeal filed by the petitioner to set aside the impugned order dated 03.09.2018 passed in O.A.No.151 of 2015, on the file of Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Elayarajakumar for M/s.Ramalingam and Associates For Respondents : Mr.Srinath Sridevan for R1

¶16

2/6

¶17

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶18

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020

¶19

ORDER

¶20

[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.] The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a common

¶21

Memo dated 13.10.2020, vide USR No.19537 of 2020 dated 29.10.2020.

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

¶23

in the light of the said common Memo with Annexures, this Court may be

¶24

pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw these Writ Petitions with a consequential direction, directing the Registry to close the TDR No.T18/MTDAD 0487845, in the name of the Registrar General and issue

¶25

necessary orders for payment of Rs.2.50 crores with accrued interest in

¶26

favour of Union Bank of India, SAM Branch, Chennai.

¶27

This Court heard the submission of Mr.Srinath Sridevan, learned standing counsel appearing for the 1^st respondent and he has no serious objections in ordering the common Memo, but his only request is that the payment shall be made at the earliest point of time.

¶28

3/6

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶30

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020

¶31

This Court heard the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶32

The common Memo dated 13.10.2020, filed on behalf of the

¶33

petitioner vide USR No.19537 of 2020 dated 29.10.2020, is taken on file and recorded and it shall also form part of the record.

¶34

In the light of the same, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with a consequential direction, directing the Registrar General of this Court to close TDR No.T18/MTDAD 0487845 and make necessary

¶35

payment of Rs.2.50 crores by means of Pay Order with accrued interest in

¶36

favour of Union Bank of India, SAM Branch, Chennai. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶37

[M.S.N.,J] [R.H., J] sk 09.11.2020 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

¶38

4/6

¶39

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶40

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020

¶41

To The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal,

¶42

Chennai.

¶43

Copy to:

¶44

The Registrar General,

¶45

Madras High Court.

¶46

5/6

¶47

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶48

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020

¶49

M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AND R.HEMALATHA.,J sk

¶50

WP.Nos.259 and 265 of 2020
and W.M.P.Nos.307, 310 and 312 of 2020
09.11.2020

¶51

6/6

¶52

http://www.judis.nic.in

Andhra Bank v. Union Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Andhra Bank v. Union Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suo Motu Vs Suo Motu

A.Maruthupandiyan, Vs The Member secretary

Dhanapal Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

V.Venkata Sivakumar Vs Institute of Cost accountants of India

P.Selvam, Vs The District Collector and Inspector of Panchayats

M.Veluchamy Vs The District Collector